The limits of secular discourse
Ett inlägg från bloggen: Yada yada
Publicerad den 22 augusti 2013 15:03. Läs inlägget på bloggen här.
Stanley Fish recenserar Steven Smith's The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse
It is not, Smith tells us, that secular reason can’t do the job (of identifying ultimate meanings and values) we need religion to do; it’s worse; secular reason can’t do its own self-assigned job — of describing the world in ways that allow us to move forward in our projects — without importing, but not acknowledging, the very perspectives it pushes away in disdain.
While secular discourse, in the form of statistical analyses, controlled experiments and rational decision-trees, can yield banks of data that can then be subdivided and refined in more ways than we can count, it cannot tell us what that data means or what to do with it. No matter how much information you pile up and how sophisticated are the analytical operations you perform, you will never get one millimeter closer to the moment when you can move from the piled-up information to some lesson or imperative it points to; for it doesn’t point anywhere; it just sits there, inert and empty. ... Läs mer...
![](https://cdn.healthtrader.com/banner-gif-53046b6c5753d-B.gif)